As if enough disasters haven't befallen China this year, something so catastrophic and unpredictable as an earthquake renders everyone humble and powerless in the face of nature.
I've been following the news on the 7.8 magnitude earthquake that hit Southwest China, 60 miles Northwest of Chengdu in Wenchuan County . Aftershocks were felt in neighboring provinces Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu, and all the way in Shanghai and Thailand. 900 miles away in Beijing, friends felt tremors and had to evacuate their skyscraper offices. Thankfully, everyone I know right now, is safe.
At first, the trickle was IMs and emails, then frantic phone calls ensued and I explained that we, here in Beijing, are fine. But as I checked the news throughout the day Monday, the official death toll rose from 4, to a few hundred, to 8500 by late Monday night. As of 5pm Tuesday, the government reported a nearly 12,000 killed and countless more injured as people remain trapped in collapsed buildings.
Over dinner with some friends yesterday, we speculated about the real death toll being much higher than official reports. And I came home, and was shocked to see numbers nearing ten thousand, but all reports so far indicate that the Chinese government is handling this with both a sense of urgency and transparency. Maybe there is a bright spot to be found in this time of need. Many articles have pointed out that the earthquake hit at a place where Han, Hui, and Tibetans live together, where the India and Eurasia tectonic plates collided. But amidst the ethnic turmoil over Tibet and PR blit in China the last few months, devastation has hit the rural poor equally, without regard to ethnic labeling, and the response, also, has been unified.
Media coverage of the earthquake has included many first-person interviews and videos of earthquake and relief effort. Video of Premier Wen Jiabao visiting Dujiangyan both didn't exploit and didn't eliminate images of a sobbing, weather-beaten granny, clearly struggling with her grief after this disaster, standing next to him. I agree with China Law Blog that even a few years ago (example: SARS), the government couldn't be trusted to release an accurate casualty count or allow media at the scene of an event like this, so with all of the ugly censorship and anti-CNN goading that has gone on lately, the government is really trying to rescue and respond to the earthquake victims instead of hiding from potential embarassment. Premier Wen was on the ground within 6 hours, over 1,300 rescue workers were on the ground in Wenchuan county (population: a little over 100,000) within 12 hours.
Later, people will speculate about whether this earthquake could have been predicted (not even with the best technology is it completely possible), and whether humans were partially to fault. Also at dinner, we talked about the argument that the huge reservoir the Three Gorges Dam project has created is predicted to exacerbates earthquakes tremors. But right now, we have to find all the survivors first.
Tonight, as rescue crews have to deal with traffic jams, damaged tunnels, and rain to get to victims still buried underneath rubble, my prayers are with the victims, families, rescue workers, and laobaixing of Sichuan.
Over 65,000,000 RMB (nearly $10 million) has been donated through the Red Cross already.
How you can help (kudos to the Shanghaiist for being so vigilant in updating).
*Edit 0:44am Thurs 5/14: Pandas shaken but OK in Wolong Reserve.
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Dinner With Students I: Minzu Daxue
I had dinner with some students from the 中央民族大学 or Central University for Nationalities (CUN) last night and over plates of sweet lotus root and chicken in a claypot, they told me about their experiences in university and dreams for the future.
First of all, the school is still in lockdown after the peaceful vigil convened by some 40 Tibetan students at the university last week (which caused some Chinese leaders to bemoan the fact the Tibet "troubles" had made their way even to Beijing), so I could not meet the students on campus. When asked, the students seemed eager to deflect attention from the issue and insisted that things are normal and peaceful on-campus. But when pressed, they sheepishly explained that there are armed guards in all the dorms and only students with the university's identification card are allowed on-campus. "It is for our safety" they explained the security in place, and few seemed sympathetic to the right of the Tibetan students to protest. There has been no indication when this lockdown will end.
After some introduction the three sophomores and four graduate students spoke to me candidly about their expectations for university, and in most of their cases, their disappointment with the education and anxiety towards entering the job market. These are unique students, several are ethnic minorities themselves from faraway provinces and they attend school with a student body made up of 60-70% ethnic minorities. Several were from the first literate, nevermind college-educated, generation of their families.
The undergraduates were the most interesting. A Shui ethnic student talked about working hard to be at the top of his class in middle school, or as he modestly described, "an OK student" in Qiannan, an autonomous prefecture in remote Southern Guizhou Province riddled with so many ethnic minorities and so much poverty that it is hard to associate any particular ethnic minority or products with this area.
As it turns out, I visited this prefecture on several occasions last year and we traded notes on the bull-fighting and horse-racing competitions common during the largest holiday of the year in October. I watched his eyes shine sparkle with pride as he described the courtship songs and many rituals the Shui are known for. When this seemingly confident lad later talked about being shy and explained that he was speaking from his heart on this night, there was no denying I was surprised, and moved.
This student was lucky - as the youngest in a line of five, he was relatively free from obligations to his family. He was selected to attend a charity school in Guangzhou on scholarship where he received a superior education than in Guizhou, which has trouble attracted and retaining educated teachers.
He was not the only student to talk about missing home. When I asked a Hani student what he thought of Beijing and whether he missed his home in Yunnan, he paused, and answered, "Yes, when I was a first year, I missed it very much, but things are better now", as he looked over to his friend for reassurance. All of the students talked about dreaming about attending school in Beijing, but not really being prepared for all the challenges it brought.
One girl from Inner Mongolia spoke of her buyer's remorse towards the Communications major she had chosen. Perhaps "chosen" is not the correct term to use. Students in China test into universities, and into majors within universities through a baccalaureate exam called the gaokao (高考). This exam comes to represent their entire academic record and in many ways determines their future opportunities in life.
This girl spoke of how she wanted to study English and Law and in previous years her score would have been enough but in 2006, it only qualified her for the Communications major at CUN. Most people's understanding of communication studies, and her own tragically, would be a combination of media studies and media technology, the like. But at CUN, xinxi (信息) means neither xinwen, news, nor tongxin (通信), mobile technology but the science behind how communications technology works so lots of math and physics which for this social humanities lover has been the bane of her existence. She also quickly noted that had she been a minority (She is Han but lives in a disadvantaged and heavily Mongolian area), she would have gained admission into the programs she wanted, just a reminder of the quotas and affirmative action programs in place for minorities in China.
When asked about their ideal careers, even the graduate students, who are only a year away from their own job search, were cautious and guarded in their expectations. Slowly it came out that the girl from Inner Mongolia wanted to be a news broadcaster, the graduate students studying family education hoped to teach and the two minority students wanted to use their financial management degrees to do good. They also expressed frustration that the school offers virtually no career guidance. There was debate about the existence and function of the career service on campus indicating a lack of outreach and education on-campus about career services in general. I asked several times about internships and the students mentioned odd jobs they'd taken over breaks or research projects they initiated independently but there is no structured internship system set up or encouraged for students unlike at the elite universities of PKU and Qinghua just down the street. We were at the consensus that hands-on experience at an internship constitutes the best preparation for the real world.
With the disintegration of state-appointed work unit system, these students face many of the same challenges as university students in the workplace: an increasing competitive and globalized service-based economy with a plethora of choices. The students spoke of struggling with finding what they enjoyed doing and their life's work. The graduate students who majored in English spoke of the possibility of ditching their graduate work and being employed as translators or at a foreign company. When asked why they embarked on a graduate degree in the first place -the explained that just like in America, graduate degrees are increasingly required from civil service to company jobs. It's a matter of wenping (文平）or credentialing where a credential becomes shorthand for ability and (perhaps wrongly) experience.
One encouraging note is that none expressed the belief that a job is just a way to get paid; they all seemed to maintain hope that they could find a job that they both enjoyed and supported them. It will be a difficult search.
At the end of dinner came a deeply humbling moment. The Shui student said he admired me for taking my degree from an elite institution and then choosing to volunteer in China and using it to give back. He called it an inspiration for himself. Earlier, he explained his resolve to use his degree to help his family and people back home in Guizhou. He talked about his parents, both in their sixties, who could scarcely understand the modern world he inhabits and pressures he experiences. But you could see in the way he described them his deep respect for his parents as he expressed his determination to study hard in their honor, make money, and eventually return to set up a company in Guizhou. It reminded me of my parents' own struggle to provide a better life for me and the story of so many immigrants in America. I could hardly express to him how honored I felt and how much more worthwhile and surprising his own story was and continues to be.
As we debated the benefits and drawbacks of the Han's efforts to standardize Mandarin across the nation and bring all ethnic minorities into the fold, I thought to myself, this young Shui ethnic who speaks Shui as well as his accentless Mandarin (now rare I'm told), he truly embodies the hopes of people from his village, of the Shui's, and of all of China. It's a big responsibility. I certainly he gets some good career advice down the line.
First of all, the school is still in lockdown after the peaceful vigil convened by some 40 Tibetan students at the university last week (which caused some Chinese leaders to bemoan the fact the Tibet "troubles" had made their way even to Beijing), so I could not meet the students on campus. When asked, the students seemed eager to deflect attention from the issue and insisted that things are normal and peaceful on-campus. But when pressed, they sheepishly explained that there are armed guards in all the dorms and only students with the university's identification card are allowed on-campus. "It is for our safety" they explained the security in place, and few seemed sympathetic to the right of the Tibetan students to protest. There has been no indication when this lockdown will end.
After some introduction the three sophomores and four graduate students spoke to me candidly about their expectations for university, and in most of their cases, their disappointment with the education and anxiety towards entering the job market. These are unique students, several are ethnic minorities themselves from faraway provinces and they attend school with a student body made up of 60-70% ethnic minorities. Several were from the first literate, nevermind college-educated, generation of their families.
The undergraduates were the most interesting. A Shui ethnic student talked about working hard to be at the top of his class in middle school, or as he modestly described, "an OK student" in Qiannan, an autonomous prefecture in remote Southern Guizhou Province riddled with so many ethnic minorities and so much poverty that it is hard to associate any particular ethnic minority or products with this area.
As it turns out, I visited this prefecture on several occasions last year and we traded notes on the bull-fighting and horse-racing competitions common during the largest holiday of the year in October. I watched his eyes shine sparkle with pride as he described the courtship songs and many rituals the Shui are known for. When this seemingly confident lad later talked about being shy and explained that he was speaking from his heart on this night, there was no denying I was surprised, and moved.
This student was lucky - as the youngest in a line of five, he was relatively free from obligations to his family. He was selected to attend a charity school in Guangzhou on scholarship where he received a superior education than in Guizhou, which has trouble attracted and retaining educated teachers.
He was not the only student to talk about missing home. When I asked a Hani student what he thought of Beijing and whether he missed his home in Yunnan, he paused, and answered, "Yes, when I was a first year, I missed it very much, but things are better now", as he looked over to his friend for reassurance. All of the students talked about dreaming about attending school in Beijing, but not really being prepared for all the challenges it brought.
One girl from Inner Mongolia spoke of her buyer's remorse towards the Communications major she had chosen. Perhaps "chosen" is not the correct term to use. Students in China test into universities, and into majors within universities through a baccalaureate exam called the gaokao (高考). This exam comes to represent their entire academic record and in many ways determines their future opportunities in life.
This girl spoke of how she wanted to study English and Law and in previous years her score would have been enough but in 2006, it only qualified her for the Communications major at CUN. Most people's understanding of communication studies, and her own tragically, would be a combination of media studies and media technology, the like. But at CUN, xinxi (信息) means neither xinwen, news, nor tongxin (通信), mobile technology but the science behind how communications technology works so lots of math and physics which for this social humanities lover has been the bane of her existence. She also quickly noted that had she been a minority (She is Han but lives in a disadvantaged and heavily Mongolian area), she would have gained admission into the programs she wanted, just a reminder of the quotas and affirmative action programs in place for minorities in China.
When asked about their ideal careers, even the graduate students, who are only a year away from their own job search, were cautious and guarded in their expectations. Slowly it came out that the girl from Inner Mongolia wanted to be a news broadcaster, the graduate students studying family education hoped to teach and the two minority students wanted to use their financial management degrees to do good. They also expressed frustration that the school offers virtually no career guidance. There was debate about the existence and function of the career service on campus indicating a lack of outreach and education on-campus about career services in general. I asked several times about internships and the students mentioned odd jobs they'd taken over breaks or research projects they initiated independently but there is no structured internship system set up or encouraged for students unlike at the elite universities of PKU and Qinghua just down the street. We were at the consensus that hands-on experience at an internship constitutes the best preparation for the real world.
With the disintegration of state-appointed work unit system, these students face many of the same challenges as university students in the workplace: an increasing competitive and globalized service-based economy with a plethora of choices. The students spoke of struggling with finding what they enjoyed doing and their life's work. The graduate students who majored in English spoke of the possibility of ditching their graduate work and being employed as translators or at a foreign company. When asked why they embarked on a graduate degree in the first place -the explained that just like in America, graduate degrees are increasingly required from civil service to company jobs. It's a matter of wenping (文平）or credentialing where a credential becomes shorthand for ability and (perhaps wrongly) experience.
One encouraging note is that none expressed the belief that a job is just a way to get paid; they all seemed to maintain hope that they could find a job that they both enjoyed and supported them. It will be a difficult search.
At the end of dinner came a deeply humbling moment. The Shui student said he admired me for taking my degree from an elite institution and then choosing to volunteer in China and using it to give back. He called it an inspiration for himself. Earlier, he explained his resolve to use his degree to help his family and people back home in Guizhou. He talked about his parents, both in their sixties, who could scarcely understand the modern world he inhabits and pressures he experiences. But you could see in the way he described them his deep respect for his parents as he expressed his determination to study hard in their honor, make money, and eventually return to set up a company in Guizhou. It reminded me of my parents' own struggle to provide a better life for me and the story of so many immigrants in America. I could hardly express to him how honored I felt and how much more worthwhile and surprising his own story was and continues to be.
As we debated the benefits and drawbacks of the Han's efforts to standardize Mandarin across the nation and bring all ethnic minorities into the fold, I thought to myself, this young Shui ethnic who speaks Shui as well as his accentless Mandarin (now rare I'm told), he truly embodies the hopes of people from his village, of the Shui's, and of all of China. It's a big responsibility. I certainly he gets some good career advice down the line.
Monday, March 17, 2008
China in Lockdown
It's been awhile but I can't resist commenting on the recent protests in Tibet, the deadliest in 20 years, that have now bled into other border provinces including Sichuan and Gansu. Estimated deaths range from 10 (Xinhua) to over 80 Tibetan government in exile).
There has been a lockdown on information coming from Tibet on protests that began peacefully fully a week ago and then erupted in a serious of violent clashes between ethnic Tibetans, Han, and paramilitary police on Friday and throughout the weekend. As a result, much of the reporting has been about the difficulty of reporting when everyones hands are tied and people from residents of Lhasa to even foreign NGO workers and academics fear repurcussions for
speaking out.
More productively, several sites have offered historical explanations of China's involvement in Tibet: Wall Street Journal, Reuters
From what I can piece together, it started March 10th with peaceful protest involving over 300 monks in Tibet. March 10th is an especially tense time. It is the anniversary of the deadly 1959 revolt in Tibet which was quashed by the PLA and as a result of which the Dalai Lama left for India where he has been living in exile ever since. This year was the 49th anniversary of that protest against Chinese rule.
The next day, a Tuesday, over 600 monks converged on Lhasa to demand the release of monks detained in the protests. Police and military presence escalated, the number of protestors escalated and them bam! suddently it took a turn towards the violent as rioting began, reportedly ethnically motivated as Tibetans attacked Hui and Han Chinese storekeepers. You could say this is an inevitable escalation of protest, that the Dalai Lama (if he was involved in organizing the protests, a claim he denies) and other monks should have worked harder to ensure protestors were nonviolent, a central tenet of their Buddhist faith. On the other hand, the diversion of planes in midair away from Lhasa and the quick evacuation of tourists, both Chinese and foreign, out of Tibet, seems to indicate that the military anticipated this escalation and was prepared to deal with it with brutal force.
Basically, no one really knows what's going on. Everyone's on edge but twiddling their thumbs. The information lockdown has extended to Gansu, where journalists are no longer welcome after Saturday afternoon. Also, YouTube has been blocked along with websites including the LATimes, and The Guardian.
James Miles of the Economist, just happened to be in Lhasa and is the only accredited foreign journalist filing from Tibet with other journalists perched just outside in Gansu. His dispatches: March 13, March 14, March 16 include this eyewitness account of the rioting last Friday:
At heart is a very complicated issue, well explained by Peter Hessler back in 1999 in a piece for the Atlantic Monthly. His conversations with both Han Chinese and Tibetans in Tibet offer much needed perspective. Hessler can always be counted on for measured and critical readings of controversial subjects in contemporary China. His comparisons of China's mishandling of Tibet with America's own manifest destiny taking of land once belonging to Native Americans is especially worth thinking over.
ESWN author Roland Soong also reminds us of the ease to jump to conclusions by bringing back these words written by writer Wang Lixiong:
Any debate on Tibet inevitably centers around the Dalai Lama, the leader in exile of the Tibetan people and faith. He has drawn criticism for his moderation (while the Chinese government would disagree) and his current advocacy for autonomy for Tibet rather than complete independance. However he does not mince words and his use of the term "cultural genocide" to describe the Chinese government's efforts in Tibet obscures his own message of nonviolence.
It is difficult to deny China's investment in the infrastructure and economy of Tibet not to mention the education of millions of Tibetans in a region once ruled by monks who functioned like feudal warlords. This may mar the West's image of a shangri-la haven of religious purity but development is always accompanied by a give and take process of change which could be labeled "cultural genocide". Sure, blind nationalism now drives China to keep its country whole and unified from the Tibetan plateau to the deserts and oases in Xinjiang, to "renegade province" Taiwan (which no actually thinks functions as part of China), but its taming of savages idea should be very familiar to the West whose own colonial history extends from the removal of Native Americans from their lands to imperalism in its highest form in Africa - a continent still reeling from colonial occupation and in the throws of actual genocide.
The repurcussions of a truly bloodly putdown in Tibet are great - a clout of fear leading to long-term reduction in tourism, and a potential boycott of the Olympics. The Chinese government cannot afford to have a public relations nightmare on their hands. If they are confident that it is Dalai's "clique" that is inciting these protests and that they are exercising restraint in breaking up violence, then they should allow foreign journalists in to witness themselves just as violent protesting outside Chinese embassies overseas have been uploaded to YouTube. The lack of information only arouses more suspicion about the government's motives and actions. It sounds like the government has most of the violence under control for now. I pray for peace ...and for freedom of information.
Links:
Late last week, Melinda Liu at Newsweek offered some of the most cogent analysis, which wisely referenced history, and made some apt predictions that sadly bode true a few days later.
Danwei also offered some good links.
There has been a lockdown on information coming from Tibet on protests that began peacefully fully a week ago and then erupted in a serious of violent clashes between ethnic Tibetans, Han, and paramilitary police on Friday and throughout the weekend. As a result, much of the reporting has been about the difficulty of reporting when everyones hands are tied and people from residents of Lhasa to even foreign NGO workers and academics fear repurcussions for
speaking out.
More productively, several sites have offered historical explanations of China's involvement in Tibet: Wall Street Journal, Reuters
From what I can piece together, it started March 10th with peaceful protest involving over 300 monks in Tibet. March 10th is an especially tense time. It is the anniversary of the deadly 1959 revolt in Tibet which was quashed by the PLA and as a result of which the Dalai Lama left for India where he has been living in exile ever since. This year was the 49th anniversary of that protest against Chinese rule.
The next day, a Tuesday, over 600 monks converged on Lhasa to demand the release of monks detained in the protests. Police and military presence escalated, the number of protestors escalated and them bam! suddently it took a turn towards the violent as rioting began, reportedly ethnically motivated as Tibetans attacked Hui and Han Chinese storekeepers. You could say this is an inevitable escalation of protest, that the Dalai Lama (if he was involved in organizing the protests, a claim he denies) and other monks should have worked harder to ensure protestors were nonviolent, a central tenet of their Buddhist faith. On the other hand, the diversion of planes in midair away from Lhasa and the quick evacuation of tourists, both Chinese and foreign, out of Tibet, seems to indicate that the military anticipated this escalation and was prepared to deal with it with brutal force.
Basically, no one really knows what's going on. Everyone's on edge but twiddling their thumbs. The information lockdown has extended to Gansu, where journalists are no longer welcome after Saturday afternoon. Also, YouTube has been blocked along with websites including the LATimes, and The Guardian.
James Miles of the Economist, just happened to be in Lhasa and is the only accredited foreign journalist filing from Tibet with other journalists perched just outside in Gansu. His dispatches: March 13, March 14, March 16 include this eyewitness account of the rioting last Friday:
"The mobs, ranging from small groups of youths (some armed with traditional Tibetan swords) to crowds of many dozens, including women and children, rampaged through the narrow alleys of the Tibetan quarter. They battered the shutters of shops, broke in and seized whatever they could, from hunks of meat to gas canisters and clothing. Some goods they carried away—little children could be seen looting a toyshop—but most they heaped in the streets and set alight.
Within a couple of hours, fires were blazing in the streets across much of the city. Some buildings caught fire too. A pall of smoke blanketed Lhasa, obscuring the ancient Potala—the city’s most famous monument, which covers a hillside overlooking the city."
At heart is a very complicated issue, well explained by Peter Hessler back in 1999 in a piece for the Atlantic Monthly. His conversations with both Han Chinese and Tibetans in Tibet offer much needed perspective. Hessler can always be counted on for measured and critical readings of controversial subjects in contemporary China. His comparisons of China's mishandling of Tibet with America's own manifest destiny taking of land once belonging to Native Americans is especially worth thinking over.
ESWN author Roland Soong also reminds us of the ease to jump to conclusions by bringing back these words written by writer Wang Lixiong:
"Today, information on Tibet is duopolized by two different political propaganda machines. One machine is located in Beijing, and the other in Dharamsala. Since Tibet is to a large extent still under a state of blockade, other individuals or organizations find it very difficult to obtain independent information (especially at the macroscopic level). Like it or not, people who are concerned about Tibet are getting most of their information from these two propaganda machines.These polarized lenses make any kind of meaningful debate difficult. Without images to support either side right now, I hope people take the time during this information blackout to rethink their own assumptions on Tibet and review history.
The bad thing is that the information from these two sources is almost surely conflicting with and even completely opposite to each other. Faced with this absurd situation, the solution is to choose your position first and decide which side you want to stand with, and then you treat the information from that side as true and everything from the other side as false."
Any debate on Tibet inevitably centers around the Dalai Lama, the leader in exile of the Tibetan people and faith. He has drawn criticism for his moderation (while the Chinese government would disagree) and his current advocacy for autonomy for Tibet rather than complete independance. However he does not mince words and his use of the term "cultural genocide" to describe the Chinese government's efforts in Tibet obscures his own message of nonviolence.
It is difficult to deny China's investment in the infrastructure and economy of Tibet not to mention the education of millions of Tibetans in a region once ruled by monks who functioned like feudal warlords. This may mar the West's image of a shangri-la haven of religious purity but development is always accompanied by a give and take process of change which could be labeled "cultural genocide". Sure, blind nationalism now drives China to keep its country whole and unified from the Tibetan plateau to the deserts and oases in Xinjiang, to "renegade province" Taiwan (which no actually thinks functions as part of China), but its taming of savages idea should be very familiar to the West whose own colonial history extends from the removal of Native Americans from their lands to imperalism in its highest form in Africa - a continent still reeling from colonial occupation and in the throws of actual genocide.
The repurcussions of a truly bloodly putdown in Tibet are great - a clout of fear leading to long-term reduction in tourism, and a potential boycott of the Olympics. The Chinese government cannot afford to have a public relations nightmare on their hands. If they are confident that it is Dalai's "clique" that is inciting these protests and that they are exercising restraint in breaking up violence, then they should allow foreign journalists in to witness themselves just as violent protesting outside Chinese embassies overseas have been uploaded to YouTube. The lack of information only arouses more suspicion about the government's motives and actions. It sounds like the government has most of the violence under control for now. I pray for peace ...and for freedom of information.
Links:
Late last week, Melinda Liu at Newsweek offered some of the most cogent analysis, which wisely referenced history, and made some apt predictions that sadly bode true a few days later.
Danwei also offered some good links.
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Links for 2008-2-22
- Much ado about abang: about.com is launching a Chinese version called abang.com, bang as in 帮. Read Thomas Crampton's interview of Matt Roberts, the founder:
But 1) 一帮人的帮 or bang as in "group" connotes to me a "group" of hoodlums rather than "group" of people who help (帮助） each other. 2) If only they unblocked it, Wikipedia would totally serve the purpose of a go-to online encyclopedia. It allows for a true marketplace of ideas where facts are up for revision and debate by the community as opposed to written by a few salaried "experts".
- This story of suicide was sad because it is both so common and almost always unheard. But in a country full which silences students from talking about their broken-hearted or stressed-out frieds who resort to taking their lives, maybe we need to read a few of these stories for it to hit home, just how precious life is.
- I wrestled with the Danwei question on how to translate "cheng guan" (城管) for awhile. The Chinese in the office thought "city administrative official" was appropriate, but in light of recent stories about just how out of hand their "administrative" duties can be (See beating death story of blogger Wei Wehua also linked in Danwei), maybe "municipal officer" would be more fitting. See comments for even harsher titles.
But 1) 一帮人的帮 or bang as in "group" connotes to me a "group" of hoodlums rather than "group" of people who help (帮助） each other. 2) If only they unblocked it, Wikipedia would totally serve the purpose of a go-to online encyclopedia. It allows for a true marketplace of ideas where facts are up for revision and debate by the community as opposed to written by a few salaried "experts".
- This story of suicide was sad because it is both so common and almost always unheard. But in a country full which silences students from talking about their broken-hearted or stressed-out frieds who resort to taking their lives, maybe we need to read a few of these stories for it to hit home, just how precious life is.
- I wrestled with the Danwei question on how to translate "cheng guan" (城管) for awhile. The Chinese in the office thought "city administrative official" was appropriate, but in light of recent stories about just how out of hand their "administrative" duties can be (See beating death story of blogger Wei Wehua also linked in Danwei), maybe "municipal officer" would be more fitting. See comments for even harsher titles.
Thursday, January 3, 2008
How Humane
As part of a recent reexamination of the death penalty in China from the return of death penalty review to the Supreme People's Court last year to calls for more sparing usage of the death penalty, China recently announced it is changing over from gunshots to lethal injection as the preferred method for executions.
- In the China Daily article, Jiang Xingchang, VP of the Supreme People's Court is quoted as saying that lethal injection, "is considered more humane and will eventually be used in all Intermediate People's Courts". Although there is no timetable for this changeover, "The SPC will help equip intermediate courts with all required facilities and train more professionals, particularly in the central and western regions," ...sounds like an involved process, whereas I guess all the relevant authorities were familiar with death by firing squad already. The China Daily article then quotes SPC Chief Justice Xiao Yang about the future application of the death penalty:
This is a non-response for 2 reasons: 1) Even strict retributive logic would be hard-pressed to justify the death penalty for non-violent crimes such as embezzlement or drug offenses or some of the 68 total ways one can receive the death penalty. 2) There's no justification of the state's right take away life, just a general assumption to maintain the status quo. But who should be the ultimate judge? Nearly four millenia after Hammurabi, Ghandi responded, "An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind".
Click on the China Daily link for the picture.
- The AP, and Reuters, didn't have too much to say about this yet since they were all working off the same China Daily report. BBC was a little better offering a comparison with the US:
And then some statistics:
---
For comparison, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, 36 states plus the military and federal government in the US maintain the death penalty and around 1100 people have been executed since the Death Penalty was brought back in 1976. For most states, lethal injection is the sole option, and while Idaho and Utah still allow death by firing squad, it is only offered to inmates who chose it before it was eliminated through legislation. More gruesome statistics here.
---
Beyond being seen as humane, is lethal injection (legalized in 1997, but not really used until 2000) also possibly considered a more expedient solution? The end of a BBC article from 2000 writes:
There are certainly concerns over implentation of the death penalty in China and not just from the outside. The Duihua foundation translated an editorial from The Beijing News on the SPC being flooded with death penalty cases to review and resorting to using lesser qualified judges to review them.
---
While on this topic, pictures from the last hours of a Chinese death penalty inmate, originally from daqi.com
- In the China Daily article, Jiang Xingchang, VP of the Supreme People's Court is quoted as saying that lethal injection, "is considered more humane and will eventually be used in all Intermediate People's Courts". Although there is no timetable for this changeover, "The SPC will help equip intermediate courts with all required facilities and train more professionals, particularly in the central and western regions," ...sounds like an involved process, whereas I guess all the relevant authorities were familiar with death by firing squad already. The China Daily article then quotes SPC Chief Justice Xiao Yang about the future application of the death penalty:
Though the country retains capital punishment, it should be applied only to "an extremely small number" of serious offenders, said Chief Justice Xiao Yang in a separate interview with China Daily, adding: "Each death sentence has to stand the test of time."
Xiao said abolishing the capital punishment or strictly limiting the use of the death sentence are a global trend and "China is also working toward that direction."
He, however, stressed that the goal cannot be achieved overnight.
"We cannot talk about abolishing or controlling the use of death sentences in the abstract without considering ground realities and social security conditions," Xiao said.
The chief justice has also said it is unrealistic for China to abolish the capital punishment - even for non-violent criminals - in the short term because of the strong belief among people of the concept "an eye for an eye and a life for a life".
This is a non-response for 2 reasons: 1) Even strict retributive logic would be hard-pressed to justify the death penalty for non-violent crimes such as embezzlement or drug offenses or some of the 68 total ways one can receive the death penalty. 2) There's no justification of the state's right take away life, just a general assumption to maintain the status quo. But who should be the ultimate judge? Nearly four millenia after Hammurabi, Ghandi responded, "An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind".
Click on the China Daily link for the picture.
- The AP, and Reuters, didn't have too much to say about this yet since they were all working off the same China Daily report. BBC was a little better offering a comparison with the US:
In recent months, the lethal injection has become a subject of much debate in the US.
The US Supreme Court is currently considering a case brought by two death row inmates who say the method inflicts unnecessary pain and suffering.
And then some statistics:
China does not release official statistics of its executions.
Rights group Amnesty International says that based on media reports an estimated 1,010 people were executed in 2006 - more than 60% of global executions - but it described this number as only the tip of the iceberg.
CHINA'S DEATH PENALTY
China is believed to execute more people than rest of the world combined
Non-violent crimes such as tax fraud and embezzlement carry death penalty
Other crimes include murder, rape, robbery and drug offences
China does not publish official figures on executions
Many cases are based on confessions and trials often take less than a day, observers say
---
For comparison, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, 36 states plus the military and federal government in the US maintain the death penalty and around 1100 people have been executed since the Death Penalty was brought back in 1976. For most states, lethal injection is the sole option, and while Idaho and Utah still allow death by firing squad, it is only offered to inmates who chose it before it was eliminated through legislation. More gruesome statistics here.
---
Beyond being seen as humane, is lethal injection (legalized in 1997, but not really used until 2000) also possibly considered a more expedient solution? The end of a BBC article from 2000 writes:
There have also been concerns expressed that execution by lethal injection might be used to aid the harvesting of transplant organs from executed prisoners, although officials deny using organs from executed criminals without their permission.
There are certainly concerns over implentation of the death penalty in China and not just from the outside. The Duihua foundation translated an editorial from The Beijing News on the SPC being flooded with death penalty cases to review and resorting to using lesser qualified judges to review them.
---
While on this topic, pictures from the last hours of a Chinese death penalty inmate, originally from daqi.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)